Subject	You can but not in this context. Using 'mine' as a noun
Posted by	Z32Nizzan on December 06, 2004 at 11:11 PM
	This message has been viewed 31 times.
In Reply To	No it's not, you can't contract Mine and Is. (n/m) posted by YugoBernie (NoVA) on December 06, 2004 at 10:56 PM
Message	one can contract the two. damn didnt know it was that small, i knew it would be small but that mofo is tiny - Tissan© 22:33:56 10/28/04
Follow Ups	Who on here has the highest mileage 300ZX on the odomator. - paradox77(Austin) 21:33:18 12/06/04 I've seen a 1990 Maxima with 396k on it... - ZFreak (Omaha) 21:39:30 12/06/04 ... - Z32Nizzan 21:39:56 12/06/04 my91z is up there too (n/m) - Spee 21:45:07 12/06/04 he just got to 209k - Tissan© 21:46:47 12/06/04 Mine has 105k, but my dads Maxima has 298k on it (n/m) - Southern_Z [IL] ® 21:47:01 12/06/04 147k here (n/m) - teambushido(San Diego, CA) 21:48:11 12/06/04 there was an NA on ebay once with over 300k (n/m) - Zluster 21:51:05 12/06/04 Dahm mine ONLY has 168K. But my old maxima (85SE) had 460k - Spddracer 21:57:54 12/06/04 Mine's at 232,000 =) - MiZZr_E 21:58:04 12/06/04 IBYugoBernie (n/m) - Spee 22:12:55 12/06/04 He used an apostrophe. Totally legal. (n/m) - AbnormallyAspirated 22:14:14 12/06/04 No it's not, you can't contract Mine and Is. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 22:56:41 12/06/04 red flag tossed on the field for challenge... - drivebyz300 23:08:23 12/06/04 Challenge denied. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:19:19 12/06/04 How about ones like "Werd" or "shizzle"? - ZFreak (Omaha) 23:39:30 12/06/04 You can but not in this context. Using 'mine' as a noun - Z32Nizzan 23:11:55 12/06/04 If 'mine' is a noun then it is not contracted the apostrophe - YugoBernie (NoVA) 23:14:48 12/06/04 I see what you are saying, its the difference in possesion - Z32Nizzan 23:20:02 12/06/04 :shrug: My bad. Made sense to me. (n/m) - AbnormallyAspirated 00:24:28 12/07/04 says who? besides... - mousersix (San Antonio) 01:15:28 12/07/04 It's just plain bad uneducated English, made worse when some - YugoBernie (NoVA) 10:04:19 12/07/04 105,XXX, but on the third motor (n/m) - TURB0-Z 22:12:20 12/06/04 Try 18,400 on my 1993 TT! - Idaho 22:25:39 12/06/04 still not the lowest. ;) (n/m) - SactoTodd 22:54:26 12/06/04 yes, you are da ho... 131,000 here all original (n/m) - drivebyz300 23:05:04 12/06/04 Bah...that's nothin' :-) (n/m) - Only1Z 23:24:55 12/06/04 I've got 153K on the Z and 200K plus on the Camaro (n/m) - 92nissanzx 22:26:20 12/06/04 BTW does everybody have a Z and a Maxima, jeez?! (n/m) - 92nissanzx 22:29:12 12/06/04 I have 118,000 on the Z and 179,000 on the 96 maxima (n/m) - ShakaShaun(creamofthecrop7) 23:04:27 12/06/04 I had 55k on the Z and 190k on the Maxima. :) (n/m) - ZFreak (Omaha) 23:37:22 12/06/04 This is the only time I thought my 152K was low! (n/m) - ///Mink 22:31:33 12/06/04 148,000 miles... plus I'm the original owner. - SpeedyZX 23:06:48 12/06/04 my brother in law had 330k-ish on his 1990 pickeremup - genic 23:14:32 12/06/04 185,000 with original turbos :-) (n/m) - Joe(NoVA) 00:23:57 12/07/04 do your turbos still even work at that mileage? (n/m) - FS Z 02:40:19 12/07/04 Yup - 10.5 psi steady - Joe(NoVA) 10:50:05 12/07/04 Around 140k on original turbos... - JohnC 06:06:19 12/07/04 179XXX without an engine pull, ever. - SniPer SR71 (Dallas) 10:46:06 12/07/04 I have exactly 236,152 on my na (n/m) - kikbak82 12:12:53 12/07/04 Re: I have exactly 236,152 on my na - reefatx 00:32:04 12/08/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.